Kvasny Prum. 2004; 50(10): 298-301 | DOI: 10.18832/kp2004020

Effect of trub, oxygen content and hopped wort pH on the course of fermentation.Peer-reviewed article

Mariana CVENGROSCHOVÁ, Gabriela ŠEPEĽOVÁ, Daniela ŠMOGROVIČOVÁ
1 Pivovar Šariš a. s., Pivovarská 9, 082 21 Veľký Šariš, Slovenská republika
2 Katedra biochemickej technológie, Fakulta chemickej a potravinárskej technológie STU, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovenská republika

The effects of the properties of hopped worts on the course of fermentation
and beer character were monitored in this work. Hopped
wort pH in the range of 5,1-5,4 has insignificant effects on the speed
of primary fermentation, the breakdown of diacetyl was faster in case
of hopped worts with pH = 5,1 (6,9 days), the slowest diacetyl breakdown
was observed for hopped worts with pH = 5,4 (11,4 days). From
organoleptic point of view, finished beers prepared from hopped worts
with a higher pH were preferred.
With different wort aeration (8 mg/l, 9 mg/l and 10 mg/l of oxygen),
no differences were observed during fermentation. The day of yeast
removal from cylindro-conical fermenters, decrease in diacetyl content
as well as the number of dead yeast cells (to 2 %) were comparable.
In case of hopped worts with a higher trub content, 1 day longer
breakdown of vicinal diketones (diacetyl) to the value required,
lower foam stability (by 5 s - 2 %) and a lower colloidal stability
(approx. by 3 weeks - 9 %) were observed, but no differences in
the organoleptic properties of fresh beers. In case of infusion mashing,
a higher haze level at the angle of 90° and a lower haze level
at the angle of 15° were observed in unhopped wort. In hopped
wort, a higher haze level in case of infusion mashing as well
as during decoction mashing at the angle of 90° and 15° was observed.The effects of the properties of hopped worts on the course of fermentation
and beer character were monitored in this work. Hopped
wort pH in the range of 5,1-5,4 has insignificant effects on the speed
of primary fermentation, the breakdown of diacetyl was faster in case
of hopped worts with pH = 5,1 (6,9 days), the slowest diacetyl breakdown
was observed for hopped worts with pH = 5,4 (11,4 days). From
organoleptic point of view, finished beers prepared from hopped worts
with a higher pH were preferred.
With different wort aeration (8 mg/l, 9 mg/l and 10 mg/l of oxygen),
no differences were observed during fermentation. The day of yeast
removal from cylindro-conical fermenters, decrease in diacetyl content
as well as the number of dead yeast cells (to 2 %) were comparable.
In case of hopped worts with a higher trub content, 1 day longer
breakdown of vicinal diketones (diacetyl) to the value required,
lower foam stability (by 5 s - 2 %) and a lower colloidal stability
(approx. by 3 weeks - 9 %) were observed, but no differences in
the organoleptic properties of fresh beers. In case of infusion mashing,
a higher haze level at the angle of 90° and a lower haze level
at the angle of 15° were observed in unhopped wort. In hopped
wort, a higher haze level in case of infusion mashing as well
as during decoction mashing at the angle of 90° and 15° was observed.

Keywords: fermentation, hot break, cold break, oxygen, hopped wort, pH

Published: October 1, 2004 

References

  1. Basařová, G., Janoušek, J.:Význam aminokyselín v technológii a v kvalite piva, Kvasny Prum. 46, 2000, s. 314-317. Go to original source...
  2. Chládek, L.: Problematika vířivých kádí, Kvasny Prum. 43, 1997, s. 102-105. 20 40 60 80 100 120 horúca sladina Z 90° horúca sladina Z 15° 20°C sladina Z 90° 20°C sladina Z 15° horúca mladina Z 90° horúca mladina Z 15° 20°C mladina Z 90° 20°C mladina Z 15° infúzne rmutovanie dekokčné rmutovanie
  3. Rehmanji, M., Gopal, Ch., Mola, A.: A novel stabilisation of beer with Polyclar Brewbrite TM.Tech. Q. Master. Brew. Assoc. Am. 39, 2002, s. 24-28.
  4. Goldmann, R., Dostál, J.:Snížení obsahu kalu flotací horké mladiny ve vířivé kádi. Kvasny Prum. 45, 1999, s. 7-9. Go to original source...
  5. Krüger, E., Lindemann, B., Denninger, H., Döll, W.: Separation of hot wort (Effect on taste and filterability of beer). Brauwelt international 1990, IV, s. 280-281.
  6. Waiblinger, R.: Bier Filterability. Brewer Int. 2, 2002, s. 1.
  7. Bamforth, C.: How important is wort clarity. Brew.Guardian 131, 2002, s. 26-28.
  8. Narziss, L, Mück, E.: Der Einflus langketiger Freier Fettsäuren auf die Geshmacksstabilität des Bieres. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 39, 1986, s. 296-300.
  9. Poledníková, M., Zoufalý, T.: The afect of wort break on the contents of higher fatty acids. Kvasny Prum. 45, 1999(10), Pivovarské a sladařské dny, s. 11.
  10. Forster, C., Back, W.: Proc. Eur. Brew. Conv. 27th, Cannes 1999, 727.
  11. Basařová, G.: Vývoj teórie a praxe kvasenia a dokvasovanie piva. Kvasny Prum. 48, 2002, s. 193-199. Go to original source...
  12. Chládek, L., Šíma, J.: Prevzdušnenie mladiny. Kvasny Prum. 38, 1992, s. 298-299.
  13. Narziss, L.: Kvasenie a zrenie. Kvasny Prum. 38, 1992, s. 33-34. Go to original source...
  14. Šemík, P., Sekora, M., Gubiš, J.:The operation experiences in additionaing of calcium during wort production. Kvasny Prum. 48, 2002, s. 192-194. Go to original source...
  15. Narziss, L.: Untersuchungen zur Beeinflussung der Geschmacksstabilität durch Variation technologischer Parameter bei der Bierherstellung. Monatsschr.Brauwiss. 52, 1999, s. 192-206.
  16. Vernerová, J., Čejka, P.: Poruchy hlavního kvašení a jejich příčiny. Kvasny Prum. 33, 1987, s. 33-35. Go to original source...
  17. Narziss, L. a kol.: Technological Approach to Improve Flavour Stability. Tech.Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 30, 1993, s. 48.
  18. Veldichová, Z., Debourg, A., Van Dervelde, L., Rychtera, M.: Production of Biologically Acidified Wort - Impact of Varying pH on Fermentation Performance. Kvasny Prum. 45, 1999(10), Pivovarské a sladařské dny, s. 10.
  19. Analytica EBC, 4. Edition., Brauereiund Getrnke Rundschau, Zrich, 1987.
  20. Bamforth, C.W.: pH in brewing: an Overview. Tech. Q. Master. Brew. Assoc. Am. 38, 2000, s. 1-9.
  21. Ginova-Stojanova, T., Janeva, V.: Syntéza ergosterolu a aktivita pivovarských kvasiniek. Kvasny Prum. 31, 1985, s. 201-204. Go to original source...
  22. Bamforth, C.: How important is wort clarity. Brew.Guardian 131, 2002, s. 26-28.
  23. Narziss, L., Reicheneder, E., Voigt, J.: Technologische Faktoren zur Beeinflussung des Bierschaums. Brauwelt 134, 1994, s. 360.
  24. Basařová, G., Čepička, J.: Sladařství a pivovarství. Skriptá VŠCHT, SNTL, Praha, 1985.
  25. Hlaváček, F., Lhotský, A.: Pivovarství. SNTL, Praha, 1972.
  26. O'Connor-Cox, E. S. C, Lodolo, E. J., Steyn, E. J., Axcell, B. C.: High Gravity Wort Clarity and Its Effect on BrewingYeast Performance. Tech. Q. Master. Brew. Assoc. Am. 33, 1996, s. 20.
  27. Steenberg, J., Gubiš, J., Melicharová, E., Šimek, V., Goldmann, R.: Dynamický sběr kvasnic z CKT a jejich asimilace před zakvašovaním - kvasničné hospodářství Gambrinus. Kvasny Prum. 49, 2003, s. 30-33. Go to original source...